Challenges and development of avionics: flight termination system
Keywords:
flight termination system, launch vehicle, radar tracking system, rocket trackAbstract
The aim of Flight Termination system (FTS) is to break launch vehicle (LV) flight down in case of rocket malfunction in the such way that rocket debris shall not fall down out of safety zone that is set beside rocket track on earth. There are two principal FTS architectures. First one came from rocket technology of soviet era and it was fully autonomous and automatic. Systems based on this architecture make decision using inertial system data only. On the contrary, second type systems use data from ground radar tracking systems and decision to interrupt flight is made by operator. All US LV are equipped with such kind FTS because US safety rules require this architecture as mandatorily. First one is automatic, fast and reliable but can`t recognize fault due to error in LV flight program. Another one doesn`t have this problem but has human in control loop. No progress has not occurred in FTS system during long time until the first post-soviet LV “Zenith” came to US territory with Sea Launch project. Despite “Zenith” FTS wasn`t in compliance with US safety rules LV “Zenith” has took Federal Aviation Administration approval for launches due to special features of LV “Zenith” trajectory. That fact has opened understanding that another architecture could be acceptable. As a result, the searching a new approach to formulate safety requirements has started. Then safety requirements was changed on the base of risk management theory that permitted for Space X to develop revolutionary new FTS that is autonomous, automatic, reliable and use two independent channel to make flight termination decision. Thus, conclusion of the paper is that requirements formulated on the base of risk management are significantly more versatile than statements about mandatory performance and they open different ways for designers to find optimal decision. Exactly such safety rules are expected in Ukraine because until now any normative document that regulate flight safety is absent in Ukraine.
Downloads
References
Flight Safety Analysis Handbook. Official edition. 2011. 224 p.
EWR 127-1. Eastern and Western Range Safety Requirements. Official edition. 1997.
AFSPCMAN91-710V7. Space Systems Command Manual. Ef-fective from 2022-12-27. Official edition.
NASA-STD-8719.25. Range Flight Safety Requirements. Ef-fective from 2018-02-05. Official edition.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Валерій Мазуренко (Автор)
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the journal Challenges and Issues of Modern Science are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY) license. This means that you are free to:
- Share, copy, and redistribute the article in any medium or format
- Adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the article
as long as you provide appropriate credit to the original work, include the authors' names, article title, journal name, and indicate that the work is licensed under CC BY. Any use of the material should not imply endorsement by the authors or the journal.