Finite Element Analysis of Geogrid Behavior Under a Strip Footing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15421/cims.5.343Keywords:
geosynthetic reinforcement, soil-geogrid interaction, multi-layer geogrid, shallow foundation, geogrid vertical spacing, failure mechanismAbstract
Purpose. This paper presents a two-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of multi-layer geogrid reinforcement under a strip footing on clayey and sandy soils. The research quantifies the impact of vertical spacing (h) on bearing capacity, settlement reduction, and stress distribution. Design / Method / Approach. The FEA methodology utilized the Mohr-Coulomb model and interface elements to simulate soil-geogrid interaction. Simulations were performed using Plaxis 2D, with the depth of the first geogrid layer fixed at u = 0.33B, while the vertical spacing ratio (h/B) ranged from 0.1 to 0.5, keeping other geometric parameters constant. Findings. The results confirmed the overall effectiveness of the reinforcement, leading to a significant increase in ultimate bearing capacity and a substantial reduction in settlement compared to unreinforced soil. The analysis identified distinct optimal spacings of h/B = 0.3 for clayey soil and h/B = 0.2 for sandy soil. Theoretical Implications. This research validates the role of geogrids as rigid barriers that modify failure surface trajectories. It provides a detailed understanding of load transfer mechanisms by identifying unique tensile signatures: a “bell-shaped” distribution for clay and an "M-shaped" distribution for sand. Practical Implications. These findings provide concrete design charts, allowing practitioners to optimize the vertical layout of reinforcement layers to ensure maximum efficiency without material waste. Originality. The originality and value of this work lie in the direct and simultaneous comparison of two contrasting soil types under identical geometric configurations, offering a comprehensive perspective on the influence of lithology on geogrid reinforcement. Research Limitations. However, the study has limitations, notably its purely numerical and two-dimensional nature, which restricts direct extrapolation to square or circular footing configurations. Future Research. Future studies would benefit from incorporating laboratory experimental tests to calibrate the numerical models. Article type. Applied Research.
Downloads
References
Abdel-Baki, S., Raymond G. P, & Jhonson P. (1993). Improvement of the bearing capacity of footings by a single layer of reinforcement. In Geosynthetic'93 Conf. Proc. (Vol. 1, pp. 407-416). https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1572824499400383872
Adams, M. T., & Collin, J. G. (1997). Large model spread footing load tests on geosynthetic reinforced soil foundations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 123(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(1997)123:1(66)
Ahmad, H. (2022). Sustainability effect of geogrid reinforced tire-shred sand mixtures on the load pressure-settlement response of shallow footing. Heliyon, 8(11), e11743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11743
Akinmusuru, J. O., & Akinbolade, J. A. (1981). Stability of loaded footings on reinforced soil. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 107(6), 819–827. https://doi.org/10.1061/ajgeb6.0001153
Alamshahi, S., & Hataf, N. (2009). Bearing capacity of strip footings on sand slopes reinforced with geogrid and grid-anchor. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.11.011
Banu, S., Attom, M., Abed, F., Vandanapu, R., Astillo, P. V., Al-Lozi, N., & Khalil, A. (2024). Numerical analysis of the ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing constructed on sand-over-clay sediment. Buildings, 14(4), 1164. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14041164
Basudhar, P. K., Saha, S., & Deb, K. (2007). Circular footings resting on geotextile-reinforced sand bed. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 25(6), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.09.003
Bergado, D. T., Long, P. V., & Srinivasa Murthy, B. R. (2002). A case study of geotextile-reinforced embankment on soft ground. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 20(6), 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-1144(02)00032-8
Binquet, J., & Lee, K. L. (1975). Bearing capacity analysis of reinforced earth slabs. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 101(12), 1257–1276. https://doi.org/10.1061/ajgeb6.0000220
Boushehrian, J. H., & Hataf, N. (2003). Experimental and numerical investigation of the bearing capacity of model circular and ring footings on reinforced sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 21(4), 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-1144(03)00029-3
Dash, S. K., Rajagopal, K., & Krishnaswamy, N. R. (2001). Strip footing on geocell reinforced sand beds with additional planar reinforcement. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 19(8), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-1144(01)00022-x
Dash, S. K., Sireesh, S., & Sitharam, T. G. (2003). Model studies on circular footing supported on geocell reinforced sand underlain by soft clay. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 21(4), 197–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-1144(03)00017-7
El Sawwaf, M. A. (2007). Behavior of strip footing on geogrid-reinforced sand over a soft clay slope. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 25(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.06.001
Gupta, A., Dutta, R. K., Shrivastava, R., & Khatri, V. N. (2017). Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Square/Rectangular Footing on Layered Soil. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 47(3), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0233-y
Hamidi, A., & Abbeche, K. (2019). Bearing capacity of strip footing built on geogrid-reinforced sand over soft clay slope and subjected to a vertical load. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, 19, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.19232
Huang, C.-C., & Tatsuoka, F. (1990). Bearing capacity of reinforced horizontal sandy ground. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 9(1), 51–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(90)90005-w
Jewell, R. A. (1996). Soil reinforcement with geotextiles (CIRIA Special Publication Vol. 123). Construction Industry Research and Information Association. https://books.google.com/?id=IwFSAAAAMAAJ
Khing, K. H., Das, B. M., Puri, V. K., Yen, S. C., & Cook, E. E. (1994). Foundation on strong sand underlain by weak clay with geogrid at the interface. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 13(3), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(94)90035-3
Latha, G. M., & Somwanshi, A. (2009). Effect of reinforcement form on the bearing capacity of square footings on sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27(6), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.03.005
Lovisa, J., Shukla, S. K., & Sivakugan, N. (2010). Behaviour of prestressed geotextile-reinforced sand bed supporting a loaded circular footing. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 28(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.09.002
Meyerhof, G. G. (1974). Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Footings on Sand Layer Overlying Clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 11(2), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1139/t74-018
Moraci, N., & Gioffrè, D. (2006). A simple method to evaluate the pullout resistance of extruded geogrids embedded in a compacted granular soil. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 24(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.11.001
Omar, M. T., Das, B. M., Puri, V. K., & Yen, S. C. (1993). Ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations on sand with geogrid reinforcement. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 30(3), 545–549. https://doi.org/10.1139/t93-046
Palmeira, E. M. (2009). Soil–geosynthetic interaction: Modelling and analysis. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27(5), 368–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.03.003
Pham, Q. N., & Ohtsuka, S. (2021). Ultimate bearing capacity of rigid footing on two-layered soils of sand–clay. International Journal of Geomechanics, 21(7), 04021115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0002095
Saha Roy, S., & Deb, K. (2021). Modulus of subgrade reaction of unreinforced and geogrid-reinforced granular fill over soft clay. International Journal of Geomechanics, 21(9). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0002115
Sharma, R., Chen, Q., Abu-Farsakh, M., & Yoon, S. (2009). Analytical modeling of geogrid reinforced soil foundation. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.07.002
Terzaghi, K. (1943). Theoretical Soil Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470172766
Tsukada, Y., Isoda, T., & Yamanouchi, T. (1993). Geogrid subgrade reinforcement and deep foundation improvement, Yono City, Japan. In Geosynthetics case histories (pp. 158–159). BiTech Publishers. https://trid.trb.org/View/413276
Xu, C., Liang, C., & Shen, P. (2019). Experimental and theoretical studies on the ultimate bearing capacity of geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 47(3), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.01.003
Yetimoglu, T., Wu, J. T. H., & Saglamer, A. (1994). Bearing capacity of rectangular footings on geogrid-reinforced sand. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 120(12), 2083–2099. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1994)120:12(2083)
Zhou, H., & Wen, X. (2008). Model studies on geogrid- or geocell-reinforced sand cushion on soft soil. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 26(3), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.10.002
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Brige Dublin Boussa Elenga, Severin Jean Maixent Loubouth (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the journal Challenges and Issues of Modern Science are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY) license. This means that you are free to:
- Share, copy, and redistribute the article in any medium or format
- Adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the article
as long as you provide appropriate credit to the original work, include the authors' names, article title, journal name, and indicate that the work is licensed under CC BY. Any use of the material should not imply endorsement by the authors or the journal.
