The multifaceted nature of tokens in entrepreneurial ecosystems: new horizons of digital asset axiology

Authors

Keywords:

token economics, entrepreneurial ecosystems, digital asset axiology, value creation in tokenized systems, blockchain-based business models, gnoseology of digital assets

Abstract

Purpose. This study aims to explore the multifaceted nature of tokens in entrepreneurial ecosystems and their impact on value creation and distribution processes, as well as to develop a conceptual framework integrating token economics, entrepreneurship, and digital asset axiology. Design / Method / Approach. The research employs a comprehensive literature review and synthesizes existing theories to develop a novel conceptual model. It systematizes the roles and functions of tokens in entrepreneurial ecosystems and analyzes their influence on value creation mechanisms. Findings. The study reveals that tokens serve as multifunctional tools for financing, governance, incentivization, and value representation in digital ecosystems. It identifies key aspects of tokenization's impact on value creation, including democratization of investment access, increased liquidity of intangible assets, and emergence of new monetization models. The proposed conceptual model integrates token economics, entrepreneurship, and axiology, offering a holistic view of tokenized ecosystems. Theoretical Implications. This research expands the understanding of tokens as complex socio-technical constructs and necessitates a revision of value creation theories in the context of tokenized ecosystems. Practical Implications. The findings suggest that entrepreneurs and investors should consider the multifaceted nature of tokens when developing and evaluating business models in the digital economy. The study also highlights the need for new competencies in token economics and tokenized ecosystem management. Originality / Value. The proposed conceptual model provides a novel theoretical framework for analyzing tokenized ecosystems, considering their complex socio-technical nature and interdisciplinary character. Research Limitations / Future Research. Future studies should empirically test the proposed conceptual model across various types of tokenized projects and explore the long-term socio-economic consequences of widespread tokenization adoption. Paper Type. Conceptual paper.

PURL: https://purl.org/cims/2403.030

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266

Catalini, C., & Gans, J. S. (2018). Initial coin offerings and the value of crypto tokens (NBER Working Paper No. 24418). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w24418

Chen, Y., & Bellavitis, C. (2020). Blockchain disruption and decentralized finance: The rise of decentralized business models. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13, e00151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00151

Chod, J., & Lyandres, E. (2021). A theory of ICOs: Diversification, agency, and information asymmetry. Management Science, 67(10), 5969-5989. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3754

Cong, L. W., & He, Z. (2019). Blockchain disruption and smart contracts. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1754-1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz007

Davidson, S., De Filippi, P., & Potts, J. (2018). Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism. Journal of Institutional Economics, 14(4), 639-658 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137417000200

Fisch, C. (2019). Initial coin offerings (ICOs) to finance new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.09.007

Hisseine, M. A., Chen, D., & Yang, X. (2022). The application of blockchain in social media: A systematic literature review. Applied Sciences, 12(13), 6567. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136567

Howell, S. T., Niessner, M., & Yermack, D. (2020). Initial coin offerings: Financing growth with cryptocurrency token sales. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(9), 3925-3974 https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz131

Kumar, T., Peddi, S., Animesh, R., Christ, Y., Piyas, M., & Walia, A. (2023). Impact of blockchain on social networking sites. IRE Journals, 6(10), 367-382. https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1704296.pdf

Momtaz, P. P. (2020). Initial coin offerings. PLoS ONE, 15(5), e0233018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233018

O'Dair, M. (2019). Distributed creativity: How blockchain technology will transform the creative economy. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00190-2

Oliveira, L., Zavolokina, L., Bauer, I., & Schwabe, G. (2018). To Token or not to Token: Tools for Understanding Blockchain Tokens. In International Conference of Information Systems (ICIS 2018), San Francisco, USA, 12 December 2018 - 16 December 2018, ICIS. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-157908

Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167

Voshmgir, S. (2020). Token economy: how the Web3 reinvents the internet (Second edition). BlockchainHub Berlin. https://github.com/Token-Economy-Book/EnglishOriginal

Xu, X., Weber, I., & Staples, M. (2019). Architecture for blockchain applications. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03035-3

Zavolokina, L., Bauer-Hänsel, I., Hacker, J., & Schwabe, G. (2024). Organizing for value creation in blockchain information systems. Information and Organization, 34(3), 100522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2024.100522

Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., & Föhr, L. (2019). The ICO gold rush: It's a scam, it's a bubble, it's a super challenge for regulators. Harvard International Law Journal, 60(2), 267-315. https://journals.law.harvard.edu/ilj/wp-content/uploads/sites/84/3_ICO_60.2.pdf

Zook, M., & Grote, M. H. (2020). Initial coin offerings: Linking technology and financialization. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(8), 1560-1582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20954440

Павлов, Р. А., & Павлова, Т. С. (2024). Від біткоїна до смарт-контрактів: підприємництво та філософія цінності в епоху криптоактивів. In В Т. Гринько (Ред.), Економічні детермінанти та конкурентні стратегії розвитку сучасних бізнес-структур: монографія (с. 341-407). Видавець Біла К. О. https://confcontact.com/2024-kolektyvna-monographiya/kolektyvna_monohrafiia_2024.pdf

Павлова, Т. С., & Павлов, Р. А. (2024). Онтологія цифрових об'єктів і технологічна нормативність: нові перспективи для цифрової етики. Epistemological Studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences, 7(1), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.15421/342419

Published

2024-11-26

Issue

Section

Project Management and Leadership

How to Cite

Pavlov, R., & Pavlova, T. (2024). The multifaceted nature of tokens in entrepreneurial ecosystems: new horizons of digital asset axiology. Challenges and Issues of Modern Science, 3, 250–258. https://cims.fti.dp.ua/j/article/view/226

Share